Adjuvant therapy for rare rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A case report.

Key Clinical Message: Anorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors are extremely rare, constituting less than 0.1% of rectal tumors. Surgical resection using a transanal wide excision followed by adjuvant therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors can be a successful treatment combination to remove the mass and prevent recurrence while preserving the integrity of the anal sphincter. Abstract: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a rare subset of neoplasms, accounting for about 1%-2% of primary gastrointestinal malignancies. The stomach is the most common site for GISTs, with anorectal GISTs being exceptionally rare, representing only 0.1% of all rectal tumors. The standard approach for managing localized GIST involves complete surgical excision to achieve negative microscopic margins (R0) while preserving the tumor capsule and maintaining anal sphincter function. Surgical resection with transanal wide excision followed by adjuvant therapy using tyrosine kinase inhibitors can successfully remove the mass, prevent recurrence, and preserve the anal sphincter's integrity. Adjuvant therapy with imatinib is the recommended treatment for all localized GISTs assessed to have an intermediate or high risk of relapse. Here, we report a case of a 63-year-old male with a rectal GIST who underwent transanal wide excision followed by adjuvant therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria.

BACKGROUND: The role of endoscopic resection (ER) in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has not been fully elucidated. AIMS: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of ER in patients with GISTs originating from the muscularis propria (MP). METHODS: A total of 233 consecutive patients with gastric GISTs originating from the MP layer, who underwent ER between February 2012 and May 2023, were included in this study. Clinical characteristics, tumor features, and outcomes were recorded and compared between patients who underwent en bloc resection and piecemeal resection. RESULTS: Among the 233 patients, the median size of GISTs was 12 mm (range 5-60 mm). Risk assessment categorized 190 patients as very low risk, 26 as low risk, 10 as moderate risk, and 7 as high risk. The procedures performed included endoscopic submucosal excavation (127 cases), endoscopic full-thickness resection (103 cases), and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (3 cases). The complete and R0 resection rate was 93.1%. Complications occurred in 4.7% of cases (perioperative perforations 1.7%, perioperative bleeding 1.3%, both 0.9%), resulting in conversion to surgery in 1.3% of cases. Risk factors associated with piecemeal resection were tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 0.402, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.207-0.783; P = 0.007] and shape (OR 0.045, 95% CI 0.009-0.235; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ER is proven to be an effective and reasonably safe approach for gastric GISTs originating from the MP. Notably, larger tumor size and irregular shape are identified as risk factors for piecemeal resection during ER procedures.

Comparable long­term survival outcomes of endoscopic treatment versus surgical treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a diameter of 5-10 cm.

Currently, endoscopic treatment for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been widely accepted. However, for tumors larger than 5 cm, endoscopic treatment has not been recognized by national guidelines as the standard therapy due to concerns about safety and adverse tumor outcomes. Therefore, this study compares the long-term survival outcomes of endoscopic treatment and surgical treatment for GIST in the range of 5-10 cm. We selected patients with GIST from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were employed to compare the long-term survival outcomes between endoscopic treatment and surgical treatment. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used for analysis to identify risk factors influencing patient prognosis. To balance baseline data, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1223 GIST patients were included, with 144 patients (11.8%) received endoscopic treatment and 1079 patients (88.2%) received surgical treatment. Before PSM, there was no significant difference in the long-term survival rates between the two groups [5-year OS (86.5% vs. 83.5%, P = 0.42), 10-year OS (70.4% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.42)]. After adjusting for covariates, we found that the overall survival (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.77, P = 0.19) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.99-2.89, P = 0.053) risks were comparable between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group. In the analysis after PSM, there was no significant difference between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group. Our study found that for GIST patients with tumor sizes between 5 and 10 cm, the long-term OS and CSS outcomes were similar between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic therapy versus surgical resection for 2-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A population-based comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy (ET) of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has become a viable treatment. We intended to compare long-term outcomes of ET versus surgical resection for 2-5 cm GIST using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to compare the long-term outcomes of patients treated with ET and surgical resection for GIST. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors for patients survival. To balance the clinicopathologic characteristics, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized. RESULTS: A total of 749 patients with 2-5 cm GIST were enrolled, of whom 113 accepted ET and 636 underwent surgical resection. Before PSM, there was no significant difference in long-term outcomes between ET and surgical resection (5-year overall survival (OS): 93.5% vs. 91.6%, P=0.374; 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS): 99.1% vs. 96.5%, P=0.546; 10-year OS: 71.1% vs. 78.2%, P=0.374; 10-year CSS: 93.6% vs. 92.7%, P=0.546). After adjusting for the relevant variables using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, we observed that the ET and surgical resection groups were similar in OS (HR 0.726, 95%CI 0.457-1.153, P=0.175) and CSS (HR 1.286, 95%CI 0.474-3.488, P=0.621). After PSM, the long-term OS and CSS of patients with 2-5 cm GIST after ET and surgical resection were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the long-term survival of patients with 2-5 cm gastric GIST after ET and surgical resection were comparable. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the role of ET in 2-5 cm GIST.

Digestive bleeding due to jejunal stromal tumor: A train can hide another-A case report.

Gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIST) are the most prevalent sarcoma tumors affecting the digestive tract. GIST originates from Cajal cells located within the digestive tract's wall. These cells play a crucial role in regulating digestive peristaltism as they are considered pacemaker cells. These tumors are especially located in the stomach (60%) but can also be seen in the small bowel (30%), in which jejunal stromal tumors are estimated to reach (40%). In this case report, we describe a jejunal GIST, which was initially discovered due to active bleeding, serving as the primary symptom, along with an underlying small loop intussusception. In our knowledge, GIST causing an intussusception is a rare entity in literature as well as GIST causing active bleeding. For that aim, we present a 36-year-old male patient, presented to our department with melena. An abdominal computed tomography scan was performed, revealing a small bowel intussusception associated with a 2 cm tumor. Despite the imprecise cause of the bleeding, due to the ongoing active hemorrhage, we decided to proceed with an emergency laparotomy, suspecting a tumorous origin of the bleeding. During the surgery, the tumor was located in the jejunum. The affected jejunal segment containing the tumor was resected, and an anastomosis was performed. Pathology examination confirmed a stromal tumor. The postoperative follow-up was uneventful.

Comparative Analysis of Enbloc or Piecemeal Removal After Enbloc Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and prognosis of enbloc or piecemeal removal after enbloc resection of a gastric GIST by comparing the clinical data of endoscopic en block resection and piecemeal removal (EP) and en block resection and complete removal (EC) of gastric GISTs. METHODS: A total of 111 (43 endoscopic piecemeal, and 68 complete removal) patients with gastric GIST's ≥ 2 cm in diameter who underwent endoscopic therapy from January 2016 to June 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed. In all cases, it was ensured that the tumor was intact during the resection, however, it was divided into EP group and EC group based on whether the tumor was completely removed or was cut into pieces which were then removed. The patients' recurrence-free survival rate and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were recorded. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in RFS rates between the two groups (P = 0.197). The EP group had relatively high patient age, tumor diameter, risk classification, and operation time. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of nuclear fission images, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative fasting time, complication rate and complication grading between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic piecemeal removal after en block resection of gastric GIST is safe and effective and achieves similar clinical outcomes as complete removal after en block resection.

Characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated to other tumors / Características de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal asociados a otras neoplasias

Introduction: Our aim is to analyze the differences between sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors and those associated with other tumors. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients with diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors operated at our center. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether or not they had associated other tumors, both synchronously and metachronously. Disease free survival and overall survival were calculated for both groups. Results: 96 patients were included, 60 (62.5%) were male, with a median age of 66.8 years (35–84). An association with other tumors was found in 33 cases (34.3%); 12 were synchronous (36.3%) and 21 metachronous (63.7%). The presence of mutations in associated tumors was 70% and in non-associated tumors 75%. Associated tumors were classified as low risk tumors based on Fletcher's stratification scale (p=0.001) as they usually were smaller in size and had less than ≤5 mitosis per 50 HPF compared to non-associated tumors. When analyzing overall survival, there were statistically significant differences (p=0.035) between both groups. Conclusion: The relatively high proportion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors cases with associated tumors suggests the need to carry out a study to rule out presence of a second neoplasm and a long-term follow-up should be carried out in order to diagnose a possible second neoplasm. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated with other tumors have usually low risk of recurrence with a good long-term prognosis.(AU)

Introducción: El objetivo de este estudio es analizar si existen diferencias entre los GIST esporádicos y los que se presentan asociados a otros tumores. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes operados de tumores del estroma gastrointestinal (GIST) en nuestro centro. Se dividió a los pacientes en función de si presentaban otros tumores asociados o no, de forma sincrónica o metacrónica. La supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia global se calcularon en ambos grupos. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 96 pacientes, 60 (62,5%) eran hombres con una media de edad de 66,8 años (35-84). Se encontró una asociación con otros tumores en 33 casos (34,3%); 12 de manera sincrónica (36,3%) y 21 metacrónica (63,7%). La presencia de mutaciones en el grupo de tumores asociados fue de 70% y en el de no asociados de 75%. Los tumores asociados se clasificaron como tumores de bajo riesgo según la escala de Fletcher (p = 0,001), ya que fueron de menor tamaño y presentaron menos de ≤ 5 mitosis por 50 HPF en comparación con los no asociados. Al analizar la supervivencia global, hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos grupos (p = 0,035). Conclusión: La proporción relativamente alta de casos de GIST con tumores asociados sugiere la necesidad de realizar un estudio para descartar la presencia de una segunda neoplasia y, tras el tratamiento de GIST, elaborar un seguimiento a largo plazo para diagnosticar una posible segunda neoplasia. Los GIST asociados a otros tumores suelen tener un riesgo bajo de recurrencia con un buen pronóstico a largo plazo.(AU)

Clinical features and prognosis of malignant small bowel tumors: Experience from a university hospital in Chile.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel tumors (SBT) are infrequent and represent a small proportion of digestive neoplasms. There is scarce information about SBT in Latin America. AIM: To describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, and survival of malignant SBTs. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of adult patients with histopathological diagnosis of SBT between 2007 and 2021 in a university hospital in Chile. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients [51.9% men; mean age 57 years] with SBT. Histological type: neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (43.7%, n=38), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) (21.8%, n=19), lymphoma (17.2%, n=15) and adenocarcinoma (AC) (11.5%, n=10). GIST was more frequent in duodenum (50%; n=12) and NET in the ileum (65.8%; n=25). Metastasis was observed in 17 cases, most commonly from colon and melanoma. Nausea and vomiting were significantly more often observed in AC (p=0.035), as well as gastrointestinal bleeding in GIST (p=0.007). The most common diagnostic tools were CT and CT enteroclysis with an elevated diagnostic yield (86% and 94% respectively). The 5-year survival of GIST, NET, lymphoma and AC were 94.7% (95%CI: 68.1-99.2), 82.2% (95%CI: 57.6-93.3), 40.0% (95%CI: 16.5-82.8) and 25.9% (95%CI: 4.5-55.7%), respectively. NET (HR 6.1; 95%CI: 2.1-17.2) and GIST (HR 24.4; 95%CI: 3.0-19.8) were independently associated with higher survival compared to AC, adjusted for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant SBT are rare conditions and NETs are the most common histological subtype. Clinical presentation at diagnosis, location or complications may suggest a more probable diagnosis. GIST and NET are associated with better survival compared to other malignant subtypes.

Cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors sensitive to imatinib: a retrospective analysis of two Russian cancer centers.

Background: The role of cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (mGISTs) responding to imatinib (IM) has not yet been established. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of patients with mGISTs in two Russian cancer centers. We compared two cohorts: treated (Group S) or not treated with surgery (Group NS) after a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) while on IM. Methods: A total 44 patients treated by IM as first line treatment were included in our analysis. Prognostically similar patients only sensitive to IM cases with hepatic or peritoneal metastases as well as durable response to IM lasting more than 12 months were included in a control arm. Patients in Group NS received only IM until disease progression. Patients in Group S were treated additionally with metastasectomy after having response or SD on IM. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with several trends: a higher proportion of patients achieved a PR in Group S (87% vs. 55%, P=0.165), and greater number of patients had peritoneal metastases in Group NS (45% vs. 27%, P=0.759). The median time to surgery from the initiation of IM was 8 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in Group S than Group NS: the median PFS was 78 vs. 35 months (P=0.088); the median OS was 141 vs. 80 months (P=0.154). Conclusions: The surgical resection of residual lesions after disease control with IM is likely to be beneficial to patients with mGISTs.

Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor using clip-and-cut endoscopic full-thickness resection: a single-center, retrospective cohort in Korea.

Background/Aims: To overcome the technical limitations of classic endoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), various methods have been developed. In this study, we examined the role and feasibility of clip-and-cut procedures (clip-and-cut endoscopic full-thickness resection [cc-EFTR]) for gastric GISTs. Methods: Medical records of 83 patients diagnosed with GISTs after endoscopic resection between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Moreover, clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and cc-EFTR were performed in 51 and 32 patients, respectively. The GISTs were detected in the upper third of the stomach for ESD (52.9%) and cc-EFTR (90.6%). Within the cc-EFTR group, a majority of GISTs were located in the deep muscularis propria or serosal layer, accounting for 96.9%, as opposed to those in the ESD group (45.1%). The R0 resection rates were 51.0% and 84.4% in the ESD and cc-EFTR groups, respectively. Seven (8.4%) patients required surgical treatment (six patients underwent ESD and one underwent cc-EFTR,) due to residual tumor (n=5) and post-procedure adverse events (n=2). Patients undergoing R0 or R1 resection experienced recurrence during a median 14-month follow-up period, except for one patient in the ESD group. Conclusions: Cc-EFTR displayed high R0 resection rates as the procedure safely and successfully removed small gastric GISTs.

Surgical outcomes of locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after multivisceral resection: A retrospective study of 64 patients at a single institution.

To analyze the outcome in patients who have undergone multivisceral resection (MVR) for locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and identify the risk factors for tumor recurrence and postoperative morbidity. Sixty-four patients who operated for locally advanced GISTs with MVR in PPeking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center (PUCHSC) between 2013 and 2021 were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical outcomes, recurrence, and 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 60 years. Mean tumor size was 11.1 cm. Complete resection was achieved in all patients. The estimated 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival were 86.6% and 90.0%, respectively. Independent factor of recurrence following surgery was mitotic count on multivariate analysis. Overall postoperative morbidity was 53.1% (n = 34). Severe morbidity was 21.9% (n = 14). The most common severe complication was clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (n = 12, 18.8%), followed by anastomotic leakage (n = 4, 6.3%) and Intraabdominal abscess (n = 4, 6.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative imatinib therapy could reduce overall morbidity. Long operation time, combined colectomy and pancreatectomy were independent risk factors for postoperative severe morbidity. Compared to partial pancreatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was significantly increased the incidence of severe morbidity. In conclusion, compared to systemic therapy alone, the outcome of locally advanced GISTs after MVR was more favorable. Despite the high overall morbidity, the postoperative severe morbidity and mortality of MVR were acceptable. Preoperative imatinib therapy should be recommended whenever possible. Combined pancreatectomy and colectomy are associated with significant postoperative severe morbidities. PD should be thoroughly discussed and be subject to MDT approach before surgery.

Using machine learning models to predict synchronous genitourinary cancers among gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.

Objectives: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) can occur synchronously with other neoplasms, including the genitourinary (GU) system. Machine learning (ML) may be a valuable tool in predicting synchronous GU tumors in GIST patients, and thus improving prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the use of ML algorithms to predict synchronous GU tumors among GIST patients in a specialist research center in Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from all patients with histopathologically confirmed GIST at our facility from 2003 to 2020. Patient files were reviewed for the presence of renal cell carcinoma, adrenal tumors, or other GU cancers. Three supervised ML algorithms were used: logistic regression, XGBoost Regressor, and random forests (RFs). A set of variables, including independent attributes, was entered into the models. Results: A total of 170 patients were included in the study, with 58.8% (n = 100) being male. The median age was 57 (range: 9-91) years. The majority of GISTs were gastric (60%, n = 102) with a spindle cell histology. The most common stage at diagnosis was T2 (27.6%, n = 47) and N0 (20%, n = 34). Six patients (3.5%) had synchronous GU tumors. The RF model achieved the highest accuracy with 97.1%. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the RF model is an effective tool for predicting synchronous GU tumors in GIST patients. Larger multicenter studies, utilizing more powerful algorithms such as deep learning and other artificial intelligence subsets, are necessary to further refine and improve these predictions.

Malignant rectal GIST managed with chemotherapy (Imatinib Mesylate): A case report and a comprehensive review.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors involving the gastrointestinal tract, arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal. GIST comprises about 1% of all GI tumors. Rectal GISTs are rare and comprise of approximately 5% of all GISTs and only 0.1% of rectal tumors are found to be GISTs. Rectal GISTs may be diagnosed incidentally or present with symptoms, including defecation problems, bleeding, and/or pain. We report a case of a 46-year-old male with rectal GIST metastasized to the liver and bilateral lung parenchyma managed by Imatinib Mesylate (IM) regimen. Rectal GIST although being rare, must be considered as a differential diagnosis in a patient presenting with defecatory problems with bleeding.

Comprehensive evaluation of rare case: From diagnosis to treatment of a sigmoid Schwannoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Schwannomas are uncommon tumors originating from Schwann cells, forming the neural sheath. They account for approximately 2%-6% of all mesenchymal tumors and are most commonly identified in peripheral nerve trunks, with rarity in the gastrointestinal tract. Among gastrointestinal locations, the stomach harbors the majority of nerve sheath tumors, while such occurrences in the sigmoid colon are exceptionally infrequent. CASE SUMMARY: This study presented a clinical case involving a 60-year-old female patient who, during colonoscopy, was diagnosed with a submucosal lesion that was later identified as a nerve sheath tumor. The patient underwent surgical resection, and the diagnosis was confirmed through immunohistochemistry. This study highlighted an exceptionally uncommon occurrence of a nerve sheath tumor in the sigmoid colon, which was effectively managed within our department. Additionally, a comprehensive review of relevant studies was conducted. CONCLUSION: The preoperative diagnosis of nerve sheath tumors poses challenges, as the definitive diagnosis still relies on pathology and immunohistochemistry. Although categorized as benign, these tumors have the potential to demonstrate malignant behavior. Consequently, the optimal treatment approach entails the complete surgical excision of the tumor, ensuring the absence of residual lesions at the margins.

Surgical management of a locally advanced jejunal stromal tumor: A case report of a challenging condition.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Locally advanced jejunal stromal tumors stand as a captivating and relatively rare entity, garnering attention for several reasons. Their inaccessible location by conventional endoscopy poses a diagnostic challenge. Further, treatment decisions necessitate a multidisciplinary approach, compounded by the absence of high-level evidence studies. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old patient was admitted to our surgical department with abdominal pain and chronic anemia. Abdominal CT imaging confirmed the presence of a non-metastatic sizable jejunal tumor. The patient underwent laparotomy, revealing a locally advanced jejunal tumor contracting the ileum and the ascending colon. A monobloc oncological resection was performed, followed by the restoration of digestive continuity. Anatomopathological analysis delineated a locally advanced Stromal Tumor with a high risk of recurrence. The patient underwent a course of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for 3 years, with no reported recurrence during the subsequent 3-year follow-up. DISCUSSION: Locally advanced jejunal stromal tumors are rare. Most patients present with unspecific symptoms. Diagnosis remains challenging due to their intricate anatomical location. Decisions regarding management must be deliberated within a multidisciplinary framework, tailored to each patient's unique characteristics. While combined therapeutic modalities have demonstrated efficacy in recent studies, prudence is advised given the heightened incidence of both short and long-term complications. CONCLUSION: In the absence of randomized controlled trials, the management of locally advanced jejunal stromal tumors underscores the imperative of multidisciplinary collaboration in treatment deliberations. A wide, sometimes mutilating excision is only permissible if it is complete.

Single-port intragastric wedge resection using the tunnel method: a novel surgical approach for treating endophytic gastric subepithelial tumors.

BACKGROUND: Intragastric wedge resection is an effective method for treating endophytic gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). However, retracting the stomach wall to the umbilicus is difficult in certain patients. In response, we developed a novel surgical technique for single-port intragastric wedge resection, which we termed the "tunnel method." METHODS: A transumbilical incision is made, and a wound retractor is applied. After diagnostic laparoscopy, a gastrostomy is made on the greater curvature, lower body. Another small wound retractor is inserted into the gastrostomy, and extracted through the transumbilical incision, creating a tunnel from the gastrostomy site to the umbilicus. Articulating laparoscopic instruments are inserted via the tunnel, and intragastric wedge resection is performed. We collected and analyzed the clinicopathologic and operative data of patients who underwent intragastric wedge resection via the tunnel method. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients who underwent single-port intragastric wedge resection via the tunnel method in a single tertiary referral hospital were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 54.6 ± 11.4 years, body mass index was 26.5 ± 3.4 kg/m2. Twenty-four (88.9%) patients had tumors located in the upper third of the stomach. The average operative time was 65.0 ± 24.2 min. None of the patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher postoperative complications. The average postoperative hospital stay length was 2.5 ± 0.8 days. Thirteen gastrointestinal stromal tumors, nine leiomyomas, and one neuroendocrine carcinoma, schwannoma, lipoma, spindle cell proliferative lesion, and fibrotic lesion were pathologically diagnosed. The average tumor size was 2.6 ± 1.3 cm. All cases had negative resection margins. CONCLUSIONS: Single-port intragastric wedge resection by the tunnel method is a feasible and safe approach for treating endophytic gastric SETs.

Characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated to other tumors: Características de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal asociados a otras neoplasias.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim is to analyze the differences between sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors and those associated with other tumors. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients with diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors operated at our center. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether or not they had associated other tumors, both synchronously and metachronously. Disease free survival and overall survival were calculated for both groups. RESULTS: 96 patients were included, 60 (62.5%) were male, with a median age of 66.8 (35-84). An association with other tumors was found in 33 cases (34.3%); 12 were synchronous (36.3%) and 21 metachronous (63.7%). The presence of mutations in associated tumors was 70% and in non-associated tumors 75%. Associated tumors were classified as low risk tumors based on Fletcher's stratification scale (p = 0.001) as they usually were smaller in size and had less than ≤5 mitosis per 50 HPF compared to non-associated tumors. When analyzing overall survival, there were statistically significant differences (p = 0,035) between both groups. CONCLUSION: The relatively high proportion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors cases with associated tumors suggests the need to carry out a study to rule out presence of a second neoplasm and a long-term follow-up should be carried out in order to diagnose a possible second neoplasm. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated with other tumors have usually low risk of recurrence with a good long-term prognosis.

A giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor revealed by a life-threatening hematemesis: A case report of a rare entity and a challenging management.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal malignancies in the digestive tract. Despite the stomach being their site of predilection, only a few giant GISTs have been discovered in hypovolemic shock and require urgent surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old patient was admitted for hematemesis. Initial examination revealed a compensated hemodynamic shock with a mass in the left hemi abdomen of 20 cm without signs of portal hypertension or peritonitis. After resuscitation, an abdominal CT scan was performed, showing an exophytic mass of the gastric antrum without local or distant lymph node involvement. Later, the patient went into hemodynamic shock, requiring vasoactive drugs. An urgent midline laparotomy was performed, revealing a 20-cm gastric GIST in the anterior wall of the antrum. Wedge resection was performed. The anatomopathological report confirmed the diagnosis of gastric GIST with a moderate risk of recurrence. The patient received adjuvant therapy for 3 years. No recurrence was detected. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Bleeding gastric GISTs revealed by a hypovolemic shock is a rare yet critical scenario. Considering GISTs as an etiology of digestive bleeding in life-threatening cases requires a high index of clinical suspicion. Prompt intervention is vital to control hemostasis and ensure patient stability. CONCLUSION: Open surgery is mandatory for large bleeding GISTs. The surgical approach must be tailored to the tumor's specific location. Diligent execution of the surgical procedure is vital to prevent tumor rupture. Despite their size, these tumors have a favorable prognosis, enhanced by adjuvant therapy for moderate to high recurrence risk.

The impact of contour maps on estimating the risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence: indications for adjuvant therapy: an analysis of the Kinki GIST registry.

INTRODUCTION: Contour maps enable risk classification of GIST recurrence in individual patients within 10 postoperative years. Although contour maps have been referred to in Japanese guidelines, their usefulness and role in determining indications for adjuvant therapy is still unclear in Japanese patients. The aims of this study are to investigate the validity of contour maps in Japanese patients with GIST and explore the new strategy for adjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1426 Japanese GIST patients who were registered to the registry by the Kinki GIST Study Group between 2003 and 2012 were analyzed. Patients who had R0 surgery without perioperative therapy were included in this study. The accuracy of contour maps was validated. RESULTS: Overall, 994 patients have concluded this study. Using contour maps, we validated the patients. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of patients within the GIST classification groups of 0-10%, 10-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%, 80-90%, and 90-100% were 98.1%, 96.6%, 92.3%, 48.0%, 37.3%, 41.0% and 42.4%, respectively. We confirmed that this classification by contour maps was well reflected recurrence prediction. Further, in the high-risk group stratified by the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria (m-NIHC), the 10-year RFS rate was remarkably changed at a cutoff of 40% (0-40% group vs. 40-100% group: 88.7% vs. 50.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Contour maps are effective in predicting individual recurrence rates. And it may be useful for the decision of individual strategy for high-risk patients combined with m-NIHC.

Endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the continuous development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic resection (ER) has gradually become an optional method for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, studies with a large sample or a long follow-up are lacking. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ER for gastric GISTs in the real-world setting with more than 300 enrolled patients and a follow-up period longer than 45 months. METHODS: From January 2013 to February 2023, 409 patients with a pathological diagnosis of GISTs after ER were retrospectively enrolled in this study. After excluding 86 patients with non-gastric GISTs, we assessed 323 patients with gastric GISTs. The main outcome measures were en bloc resection, complete resection, residual disease, recurrence, and complications. RESULTS: There were 194 (60.06%) females and 129 (39.94%) males, and the median age of the included patients was 58 years (51, 63). The median tumor size was 15.0 (10.0, 20.0) mm. According to the modified NIH criteria, 246 (75.85%) patients were classified as very low risk, 62 (19.20%) were classified as low risk, 12 (3.72%) were classified as moderate risk, and 3 (0.93%) were classified as high risk. A total of 287 (88.85%) patients achieved en bloc resection, and 287 (88.85%) also achieved complete resection. Only one patient showed residual and no recurrent lesions were noted during the follow-up. Regarding complications, three patients had complications, with a complication rate of 0.93%, and no severe complications requiring surgical intervention occurred. CONCLUSION: ER is an appropriate alternative method for the treatment of gastric GISTs, with an en bloc resection rate of 88.85% and a complication rate of 0.93%. No recurrence was noted during follow-up, even for GISTs with piecemeal resection.